Monday, January 16, 2012

Two by William Faulkner

Ironically, two things struck me most by this story. The first was the vivid language Faulkner used in his descriptions. "The salesman was asleep on the wet ground now, drawn into a ball against the dawn's wet chill, unshaven, the dashing city hat crumpled beneath his cheek, his necktie wrenched sideways in the collar of his soiled white shirt, his muddy trousers rolled to his knees, the brightly-polished shoes of yesterday now two shapeless lumps of caked mud" (86). Faulkner's writing, though often ambiguous and confusing, tells a story in an interesting perspective with beautiful descriptive language, which can throw the reader for a loop. The second thing I noticed was the theme of racial segregation. This theme, as we noted in class, is very common throughout Faulkner's stories. On the first page of the story, the salesman is described as "young, not yet thirty, with the assurance, the slightly soiled snap and dash, of his calling, and a white man" (76). However, during the negotiation on page 91, they "faced one another in the darkness, two shadows, faceless," which levels the playing field. Though one of the men may be white and the other black, in the dark there are no faces, no upper hands based on race.

3 comments:

  1. I love the balance between race in this story--Lucas' determination to never 'bow down' to Roth, because he sees him as a little boy = to his own son, his having to 'walk the walk' in town with the judge and officer of the court, Roth knowing that Lucas got the better of his father and questioning the strength of his own lineage--all so wonderfully twisted. And, Anna, I agree, Faulkner can write the doors right off the barn (or something).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the racial views in this story in particular are very interesting. Actually, while I was reading, I was confused with who was black and who was white (for instance, I thought George Wilkins was white, for some reason). I think this stems from Lucas's treatment and interactions with the other characters. He doesn't discriminate who is black or white, he just treats them all with the same unchanging, stolid, neutral manner we discussed in class. It seems that with Lucas, just like Anna mentioned with darkness, there is no upper hand based on race. I finally figured out who was what from Roth's treatment of George, but I think Lucas's viewpoint is especially interesting for Faulkner to use. Like Laura said, it wonderfully twists our idea of the social order - and/or it's just Faulkner being his usual confusing self.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, I also think that race is particularly fascinating in the stories, especially when it comes to Lucas. Race does not ever damage Lucas' strong pride; he says "I'm a nigger . . . But I'm a man too" (46).
    Faulkner writes of how Roth bit into his heritage, but Lucas does the same. As he continues to search for the treasure, he believes that he is the only true McCaslin left living, and has the right to the land. He becomes obsessed with the family's roots and history, much like the white men. Within the Edmond/McCaslin family, the tension has not as much to do with race as it does with the hierarchy, and establishing oneself as powerful within his roots.

    ReplyDelete