Sunday, February 12, 2012
Is it true that what 'was' still 'is'?
Throughout Go Down Moses, we have examined the interconnectedness of past and present and made the conclusion that what 'was' in the past still 'is' in the later short stories which follow the so called 'future' generations of Buck, Buddy and Old Carothers. However, in Delta Autumn, the significant differences and changes between the 'old' and 'new' South seem most apparent. There is a blatant division between Uncle Isaac and McCaslin who revere the wilderness and the land and the new generation, which seems to disregard it. This becomes obvious at the end of Delta Autumn when he says "It was a doe"(347). The fact that Roth shoots the doe shows that he has forgotten Sam Father's lessons of old that there is a time "not only when to shoot but when not to" (333). These new generations have further forgotten and abandoned God as is obvious when the old man says that "the only fighting anywhere that ever had anything of God's belling on it has been when men fought to protect does and fawns" (323), and the past values and traditions have been cast aside. Additionally, throughout the previous stories and particularly in The Bear, industrialism is encroaching on the wilderness, which is representative of the past and its traditions. In Delta Autumn Uncle Ike reflects that there is "no scream of panther but instead the long hooting of locomotives" (324). The comparison of the natural world to industrial objects shows the progression of the South towards this brave new world that is not compatible with the old values of nature. This progression suggests that what 'was' no longer 'is'. The past is only resurrected in old Uncle Ike's of "the old men...moving again among the shades of tall unaxed trees and sightless brakes where the wild strong immortal game ran forever before the tireless belling immortal hounds, falling and rising phoenix like to the soundless guns" (337). Although the image of the pheonix suggests a cyclical nature of change and suggests that the old hunt may one day be resurrected, it also shows that right now that old way of the hunt is lost in reality even if it is perserved in memory. I challenge that what 'was' 'is' in Go Down, Moses, and instead think that Delta Autumn is Faulkner's way of saying that the past has been cleared away for the new south. What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dearest, Elanor. I agree with you here. I also believe that Faulkner is trying to show the end of the Old South. He had hinted at it, shown some of it, but in Delta Autumn, it has finally arrived. From the beginning, the whole hunt has a different feel. Not only do they have to travel 170 miles further to go to their hunting spot, but they get there by car and MOTOR boat. They no longer have a home out there, but they sleep in tents. There are stark differences between this hunt and the ones Isaac participated in when he was a boy. So, yes, what was is does not apply in Delta Autumn. I like what you said about the Phoenix, but I'm not so sure that I agree with it. I don't think Faulkner is trying to hint at the fact that the Old South is going to come back, I think he's using the phoenix imagery as a simile. No disrespect, but I think you read too much into that. Rather, I think Faulkner has made the "was is" theme so obvious before this story on purpose. So that when it isn't true anymore, it's quite palpable. Faulkner highlighted that theme because it was a good way for him to show when the change is happening in the South. After all, it clearly worked; I don't think anyone is going to disagree with the fact that we're not dealing with the "Old South" anymore. Except maybe Maddy, but she'll only disagree for the sake of disagreeing, and not because she actually believes it.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with both Nellie and Peter about the change in the tone of the final chapters. The use of the title "Delta" meaning change and "Autumn" the season in which the trees ready themselves for the death that comes with winter is also important to this idea of finality. I also think your post, Nellie, ties in really well with Katherine's about the theme of motion. Although Isaac wishes the wilderness to stay frozen as in the images on the urn, it is inevitably impossible for that to be so as shown by the disconnection we see grow between man and nature in Delta Autumn. Similarly, in his old age, Isaac can no longer withstand the conditions of the hunt no matter how deeply he wishes to be able to. Through the perspective of Old Isaac and the young men, we see that was can no longer be.
ReplyDelete